How ILOs, teaching activities, and assessments connect across this lesson.
| ILO | Teaching Activity | Assessment Method | Pedagogy Link | AI Integration Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compare theories collaboratively | Part A: Collaborative theory mapping with AI-generated content as discussion starter | Instructor observation of group charts & discussion quality; exit ticket on AI limitations | Social Constructivism Co-construction of comparative framework | AI Literacy AI prompts used to generate content, then critically evaluated |
| Apply social constructivist peer teaching | Part B: Jigsaw — students design and deliver a peer-teaching segment | Peer feedback during jigsaw; instructor observation of teaching quality | Social Constructivism Learning by teaching (ZPD, scaffolding) | AI (Optional) AI support for analogy generation — groups evaluate suggestions |
| Critically evaluate an AI-generated explanation | Part A: Group critique of AI-generated theory definition | Exit ticket: name one AI limitation; summative assignment AI critique section | — | AI Literacy Evaluation of accuracy, bias, and gaps |
| Generate a revised AI explanation | Part A: Groups modify AI output; summative assignment revision task | Summative assignment: revised AI explanation + reflection on changes | — | AI Literacy Independent judgment, documentation of modifications |
| Reflect on human judgment vs. AI | Synthesis discussion; summative assignment reflection section | Reflection section of summative assignment | Social Constructivism Metacognitive dialogue about knowledge sources | AI Literacy Articulates when and why human judgment overrides AI |
Rows tagged with both colours indicate moments where social learning and AI evaluation coincide most strongly.
This matrix is a living planning tool. When adapting this lesson for a new cohort: